Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4727541"

My name is Detective Durnell. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a two bedroom one bathroom beach house. The alleged victim was Felix. Felix is not a nice person, and becouse of this he does not a alot of friends. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Vera and Kendra. They killed Felix for his money. Though the only way they will get Felix's money, is becouse he put them with two other friends in his will. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was they added somethig, by mixing powder into the ice cubes. The evidence was found in the ice tray in Felix's house. The test performed was a Ph test. The results of the test were after conducting the PH test, the ice water was a base, not a neutral or an acid. This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera and Kendra poisoned Felix, by adding somethig in the ice. Also, Vera is a chemist and has the knoledge to mix inredents together, that could kill someone. .

The next piece of evidence collected was powderon the bottem of Veraand Kendra's shoes. It was found at Felix's house. That had footprints wear found near Felix's body. The test performed was a Ph test. The results of the test were when I did the footprint test, I found footprints by Felix's body. Then, the footprints lead up to Vera and Kendra. I found out that the footprints lead to Vera and Kendra by, looking at all the suspecect's footprints. Also, they had cornstarch on thebottem of their shoes. This connects the suspect to the crime because they made the cornstarch that they stepped in. That was the black footprints, found near Felix's body.

Another piece of evidence collected was fake blood (Powders test). It was found near Felix at his house. The test performed was a Ph. The results of the test were Vera and Kendra found by there being cornstarch in the fake blood, which was on the bottem of their shoes. This connects the suspect to the crime because after, we did the powder test we found, the cornstarch helped make fake blood.Since Vera and Kendra had the cornstarch on their shoes, they must have made the fake blood to. . (Why would they make fake blood?)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. That lead up to Vera and Kendra poisened Felix, stepped in cornstarch, and made fake blood. (This was supposed to be a step-bystep explanation of how they poisoned Felix that day.)

Therefore, Vera and Kendra killed Felix committed the crime of killing Felix, by having cornstarch on their shoes. That lead to the ice tray,and everything to do with fake blood, for killing Felix his they will get by be getting his money by being put in his will.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located__**.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __**The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || **__ Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  __** || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __** Conclusion summarizes information.  **__ || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || ** __All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__  ** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 49/57  ||